📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #PUBLIC Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Join Gate Launchpool Round 297 — PublicAI (PUBLIC) and share your post on Gate Square for a chance to win from a 4,000 $PUBLIC prize pool
🎨 Event Period
Aug 18, 2025, 10:00 – Aug 22, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate
Post original content on Gate Square related to PublicAI (PUBLIC) or the ongoing Launchpool event
Content must be at least 100 words (analysis, tutorials, creative graphics, reviews, etc.)
Add hashtag: #PUBLIC Creative Contest#
Include screenshots of your Launchpool participation (e.g., staking record, reward
#GFT# Talking about the recent situation of this coin, personal opinion. When this project party sees the Bull Market coming, they want to play people for suckers, and I guess they don't have enough supply. So what do they do? They start to release Unfavourable Information messages. The first is to make suckers hand over their chips, and the second is to play people for suckers casually. They want to have more chips in their hands and make more profits from pumping. So why did exchanges delist it? I guess this project party didn't inform the platform when they played people for suckers, and the platform and Large Investors didn't open short orders. That's why the leverage and contract fees were normal at first. Later, when exchanges delisted it, the project party clarified that the fees were abnormal and mentioned that only this platform and a certain Easy platform have contracts. In summary, it's okay for you to play people for suckers, but you have to let the platform and Large Investors get a share. I won't play this project party anymore. I've also been played for suckers. I can usually hold on during normal declines, but a project party that can arbitrarily increase the coin supply unlimitedly, I'm out.