Baseprotocol leader: Unlike Solana+SVM, Ethereum+EVM believes that there is an infinite need to build contracts with constraints.

Solana co-founder toly said, "There are only 6 important (underlying) Smart Contracts," while Base protocol leader Jesse Pollak said, "In my opinion, one of the biggest philosophical differences between Solana+SVM and ETH+EVM is our view on what can and will be built on-chain using Smart Contracts." In the Solana field, the current view is that 'only about 6 contracts are worth writing'. Therefore, these contracts are fixed and reused, with less focus on contract verification, open source, scalability, and expansion. Our mission is to build a decentralized NASDAQ with a focus on capital market functionality. In the EVM field, the current mindset is that we have only touched the surface of the world computer, and there are about infinite contracts to be built. This leads to everything being open source, verified, and built to be scalable, forkable, and expandable. Our mission is to build a global economy, including every component of the economy (including two capital markets, etc.). It will be interesting to see how these philosophies evolve in the coming years. Both have plenty of opportunities.

Earlier today, in response to the views expressed by the ETH community members that 'L2 is the most sustainable blockchain sales business,' Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko commented, 'It seems logical, but it's also wrong. Multiple L2s are meaningless. If a single L2 can handle parallel execution, then it can exhaust all blobspace and run every use case. More importantly, there are no infinitely useful Smart Contracts, let alone execution environments.' The (underlying) Smart Contract is only about 6 (left and right). The developers' optionality is unlimited, which is simply not necessary. In fact, any additional developer optionality that increases business risk is negative, such as the erc20 interface. Any additional sorter, L2 multi-signature, governance system, VM customization, etc., increases business risk? Later, he added in the comments, 'In all chains, what people are currently using and doing are tokens, NFTs, and AMMs. Then maybe it's the joint curve/lending/oracle/clobs/perps. I haven't seen this kind of change become the decisive driving factor for PMF yet.'